SECTION A: ESSAY
Your answer should not be less than 450 words. You are advised to spend 50 minutes on this section.
You are the principal speaker in a debate on the motion: Living in one’s country is more advantageous than living abroad. Write your argument for or against the motion.
Explanation
LIVING IN ONE'S COUNTRY IS MORE ADVANTAGEOUS THAN LIVING ABROAD
Mr. Chairman, Panel of Judges, Accurate Timekeeper, Distinguished Audience, I stand before you today to propose the motion that "Living in one's country is more advantageous than living abroad." While it is undeniable that opportunities exist beyond our national borders, I strongly believe that remaining in one’s home country offers far greater benefits in terms of cultural identity, emotional stability, national development, and long-term security.
Firstly, living in one’s country fosters a strong sense of cultural identity and belonging. Culture is an integral part of an individual's identity, influencing their values, beliefs, and traditions. When people migrate abroad, they often struggle to preserve their native customs and languages due to cultural assimilation. In contrast, remaining in one's home country allows individuals to stay connected to their roots, engage in local traditions, and pass these values down to future generations without the fear of losing them.
Secondly, emotional stability and social support are more readily available at home. One of the greatest challenges of living abroad is loneliness and the lack of a strong support system. Many migrants face emotional distress due to homesickness and cultural isolation. At home, individuals have their family, friends, and communities to offer them support during difficult times. The comfort of being surrounded by familiar people and a known environment significantly contributes to one's overall well-being and happiness.
Another major advantage is that living in one’s country contributes to national development. When skilled individuals remain in their home country, they help in the growth of the economy by contributing their expertise to different sectors. Brain drain has become a significant issue in many developing countries where professionals such as doctors, engineers, and scientists leave for better opportunities abroad. If these individuals stay and work towards national progress, they can help build industries, improve public services, and contribute to the general welfare of the country.
Furthermore, residing in one’s home country ensures long-term stability and security. Many people move abroad in search of better opportunities, but they often face challenges such as visa restrictions, discrimination, and uncertain residency statuses. In contrast, living in one’s country provides a sense of permanence, with full legal rights and privileges that are often denied to immigrants. Additionally, adapting to new laws, customs, and sometimes even weather conditions in foreign lands can be a daunting experience.
Opponents of this motion might argue that living abroad provides better economic opportunities and a higher standard of living. While this may be true in some cases, it is also important to note that success is not solely dependent on location but rather on hard work, determination, and innovation. Many people have built successful lives within their home countries, proving that prosperity is achievable anywhere.
In conclusion, the advantages of living in one’s country far outweigh those of living abroad. From maintaining cultural identity and emotional well-being to contributing to national development and enjoying long-term security, it is clear that staying in one's homeland offers numerous benefits. I, therefore, urge this esteemed audience to support this motion wholeheartedly.
Thank you.