The main argument against the 1999 Constitution is that
- it was imposed by the military
- the executive have immunity clause
-
It is expensive to operate
- It did not create additional states
The correct answer is: C
Explanation
The main argument against the 1999 constitution is that it is costly to run. The constitution operates a Presidential System of government with comprehensive duplication of political function at the federal, state and local levels. The separation of the Legislative and the Executive arm as well as the duplication of political functions make this system expensive to operate.